| 网站首页 | 业界新闻 | 小组 | 威客 | 人才 | 下载频道 | 博客 | 代码贴 | 在线编程 | 编程论坛
欢迎加入我们,一同切磋技术
用户名:   
 
密 码:  
共有 881 人关注过本帖
标题:String.Empty vs. ""
只看楼主 加入收藏
live41
Rank: 10Rank: 10Rank: 10
等 级:贵宾
威 望:67
帖 子:12442
专家分:0
注 册:2004-7-22
结帖率:66.67%
收藏
 问题点数:0 回复次数:2 
String.Empty vs. ""
So, I just converted a bunch of code that used "" as an empty string like this:

if(myString == "") anotherString = "";

to

if(myString.Equals(String.Empty))   anotherString = String.Empty;

and I'm wondering if I did the right thing, using String.Empty. I hate having quoted strings in code and prefer to stay away from them whenever possible.   This generally leads to code that is more strongly typed, and easier to maintain, so using String.Empty intuitively feels better than ““.   But, I've actually found a concrete reason to use String.Empty - I did some research and found that in a test, str.Equals(String.Empty) is faster than comparing to ""!    Well, okay. Research isn't the right word, “Doing one google search and accepting on faith the first post I saw” is slightly more accurate.   I even created a little graph of the claims in this post here, that String.Empty is faster.   I'm too lazy to do the test myself, so if you want to verify this, knock yourself out.   I do love making graphs though.


图片附件: 游客没有浏览图片的权限,请 登录注册



----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Here are the results
Checking with [s == ""] test.

Empty string, 10315.6250 milliseconds
Short string, 8307.8125 milliseconds
Long string, 8564.0625 milliseconds


Checking with [s == string.Empty] test.

Empty string, 3573.4375 milliseconds
Short string, 8307.8125 milliseconds
Long string, 8603.1250 milliseconds


Checking with [s.Equals("")] test.

Empty string, 9517.1875 milliseconds
Short string, 7537.5000 milliseconds
Long string, 7576.5625 milliseconds


Checking with [s.Equals(string.Empty)] test.

Empty string, 9540.6250 milliseconds
Short string, 7515.6250 milliseconds
Long string, 7607.8125 milliseconds


Checking with [s.Length == 0] test.

Empty string, 443.7500 milliseconds
Short string, 443.7500 milliseconds
Long string, 445.3125 milliseconds


http://


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------


String.IsNullOrEmpty()
--------------------------------
NULL = 62 milliseconds
Empty = 46 milliseconds
"" = 46 milliseconds


str == null
---------------
NULL = 31 milliseconds
Empty = 46 milliseconds
"" = 31 milliseconds


str == null || str == String.Empty
----------------------------------------------
NULL = 46 milliseconds
Empty = 62 milliseconds
"" = 359 milliseconds


str == null || str == ""
------------------------------
NULL = 46 milliseconds
Empty = 343 milliseconds
"" = 78 milliseconds


str == null || str.length == 0
---------------------------------------
NULL = 31 milliseconds
Empty = 63 milliseconds
"" = 62 milliseconds


http://

[[it] 本帖最后由 live41 于 2008-2-5 05:10 编辑 [/it]]
搜索更多相关主题的帖子: String Empty 
2008-02-05 04:54
live41
Rank: 10Rank: 10Rank: 10
等 级:贵宾
威 望:67
帖 子:12442
专家分:0
注 册:2004-7-22
收藏
得分:0 
大体意思是说字符串比较的效率

判断string是否是没有字符的比较的效率

显然,是if(string.Length==0)最快~
2008-02-05 04:56
peach5460
Rank: 15Rank: 15Rank: 15Rank: 15Rank: 15
来 自:武汉
等 级:贵宾
威 望:30
帖 子:2780
专家分:6060
注 册:2008-1-28
收藏
得分:0 
哦...

if(string.Length==0)也是我常用的语句,呵呵

我总觉得授人以鱼不如授人以渔...
可是总有些SB叫嚣着:要么给代码给答案,要么滚蛋...
虽然我知道不要跟SB一般见识,但是我真的没修炼到宠辱不惊...
2008-02-05 07:57
快速回复:String.Empty vs. ""
数据加载中...
 
   



关于我们 | 广告合作 | 编程中国 | 清除Cookies | TOP | 手机版

编程中国 版权所有,并保留所有权利。
Powered by Discuz, Processed in 0.016507 second(s), 8 queries.
Copyright©2004-2024, BCCN.NET, All Rights Reserved